Friday, July 18, 2008

Erdrich's "Plague of Doves"

Early on in Louise Erdrich's Plague of Doves, she describes the roof of a rural church covered by the plague of doves referenced in the title. "In play it seemed," bird after bird "flew up and knocked a bird off the holy cross that marked the cabin as a church, then took its place, only to be knocked off the crosspiece in turn."



Similarly, the stories, truths and voices gathered in this novel vie for the attention of the reader. The temptation is to try and connect them, to make a large sense of them. There are connections: taking place across the span of approximately a century, the stories in this book all take place in Pluto, North Dakota and its surrounding reservation. The narrator in one will be a character in another, while others are related across time by blood. Yet, connections between stories are often hard to glimpse. History and events impact folks in often oblique if not opaque ways. History may be about connecting story lines and establishing patterns. But, as the novel suggests, history is a text hard to read: it's always a half-told tale being retold.



Evelina Harp tells the pivotal story of the novel: the unjust lynching of four Native Americans, including a boy, after a "white" farm family is found gruesomely murdered. Evelina doesn't so much tell it, as recount her beloved grandfather's telling of it. She is drawn to it by her beloved Grandfather's prominent role in it.



Evelina is fascinated by the tale. She has a youthful desire to figure out the adult world and it's mysteries. Without being quite conscious of it, she is looking for justice or explanation for the horrific deed. That can't be found in the story, so Evelina is compelled to find it in the unfolding of time. She becomes "obsessed with lineage," eager to draw lines clearly connecting evildoers in the past to evildoers in the present, to victims in the present. She is hoping to draw lines that will distance her loved ones from responsibility for past evils and which will point to some kind of retribution in the present. To do so, she attempts to trace out charts with lines connecting the perpetrators and victims of injustice in the past to herself and the folks who surround her in the present. She writes in pencil, but nevertheless ends up finding the task "so complicated that [she]erased parts...until [she] wore right through the paper," and discovers she "could not erase the questions underneath, and Mooshum was no help."



This tale of racial hatred is knocked from the cross of the reader's attention by an older tale that might be seen to speak to the possibilities of brotherhood. However, told by the stoic-loving Judge Antone Coutts, it is offered more as a mild caution against all human effort to make a claim and impose order on nature. Like Evelina, Coutt's tale is his grandfathers, culled from a journal in which this ancestor chronicled his part in a land-stakes company's doomed attempt to settle the area around Pluto in the latter part of the nineteenth century. In summary, Antone lumps this 'early,' white effort to settle the town of Pluto with "all desperate enterprises that involve boundaries we place upon the earth."



In Antone's tale the 'white' men, ancestors of many folks now living in Pluto, are saved time and time again by their native American trackers, likewise ancestors of many of these same Plutonians. However, it is never clear that brotherhood comes about between the parties as much as a temporary and thoughtless tolerance compelled by necessity. Moreover, whatever brotherhood is brought about comes to the fore only in the face of what would seem a rather capricious and hostile natural world.



Of course, given the mixed blood of most of the town/novel's present day inhabitants, one might question the function or utility of tales expressing the possibilities of racial harmony. As an older and wiser Evelina remarks, "some of us have mixed in the spring of our existence both guilt and victim, [and] there is no unraveling the rope." Indeed, as Antone remarks, "We can't seem to keep our hands off one antoher...and every attempt to foil our lusts through laws and religious dictums seems bound instead to incite transgressions." His second story, following directly on his grandfather's tale, is a more recent and convoluted one demonstrating the truth of this.



It involves Eugene Wildstrand, a banker and descendant of one of the white lynchers. Bored in his marriage and engaged in an affair with a local Native American woman, Wildstrand fake 'kidnaps' his own wife in conjunction with his girlfriend's brother, Billy Peace. Billy's sister, Maggie, is pregnant with Wildstrand's child, and Wildstrand hopes to provide her with the means, via the ransom money, to raise their child while preserving his marriage and status. He fears of he gives up the latter, Maggie will no longer love him. A pretty clever argument: if I leave my wife, it will ruin my status, my earning power, and my girlfriend will no longer love me.



Wildstrand's kidnapping plan goes awry. Wildstrand ends up in jail, separated and estranged from both his wife and girlfriend. Billy escapes justice by joining the army and shipping to Korea. However, young and green, his time in Korea during the war drives him over the bend and he ends up finding solace in millenial types of religious ideas.. When he eventually returns to Pluto, he takes up with Marne Wolde and begins a cultish religious commune on her families land.



Wildstrand and Maggie's baby, Corwin, grows up a troubled youth. Antone describes him as a "a bad thing waiting for a worse to happen. A mistake, but one that we kept trying to salvage because he was so young." Corwin is also the love of Evelina's life and comes in and rescues her when she ends up resident at a mental hospital she started at as a volunteer.



Evelina ends up there kind of mysteriously. One can trace out the factual cause and effect that leads her there. Seeking self-definition as a college student, taking as her template Anais Nin, Evelina fashions herself a poet with a special interest in "those who died young, went crazy disappeared,and went to Paris." Finding that her ordinary college surroundings in North Dakota jar with this emerging self-conception, Evelina seeks out greater drama, the most desperate situation near at hand, and applies for an aide's position at a nearby mental hospital. Once there, she falls in love with a female patient, and when the relationship inevitably founders, suffers a deep depression. Mentally mired, she ends up entering herself as a patient in the very hospital she volunteered at.



However, on another level, the depression, the seeking out of the mental hospital, seems related to her infatuation with her grandfather's story and it's seemingly inexplicable evil. Evelina adores her grandfather and in her reading of his story, she identifies with him as a heroic victim. However, she begins to learn and suspect things about his story that trouble and contradict her identification with and adoration of him. In fact, while his is a story of injustice, and while their are villains and victims, Mooshum is hardly an entirely innocent victim. Disappointed and confused by what she learns about her past, she attempts to forget, to flee it, by engaging in a process of self-definition that proves destructive. When that self-definition as a French poet proves unable to provide a plausible alternative self, she is lost, without a self to present, and she ends up with the living dead at the mental hospital.



However, she can't truly bury or escape from her grandfather, from his and her story. Deep down, some part of her continually seeks out the truth of her Grandfather's story. Something seemingly drives her unwittingly to it. The mental hospital she ends up in contains that truth in the person of patient Warren Wolde. As the reader finds out at the end of the book, a great deal of evidence ties Wolde to the murder of the farm family for which the Native American men are unjustly lynched. However, the town is never able to put Wolde with the murders. For most of his life, he has lived semi-anonymously on his family farm with his brother (Marne Wolde's father). To the extent he's known at all, he's seen as kind of a crazy, marginal old man who goes about muttering and staring balefully. In retrospect, it is hard to see why nobody never connected him with the act, but his revelation as the likely perpetrator of the murders came as a surprise to this reader. Like the townspeople, I fixed him in my mind as one thing. I drew a line, fixed a mental boundary around him. Earlier, I quoted Antone when he laments "all desperate enterprises that involve boundaries we place upon the earth." Similarly, the novel cautions against the mental equivalent: holding too tight to our conceptions of what is. Reality is protean, dooming all attempts to know it, to fix it as simply this or simply that. It is opposed to the idea of truth.



Blinded by her pre-conceptions, Evelina never does identify Warren as the source of the evil initiating the evil events of her grandfather's story. Yet, one might argue that in her obsessive desire to find an explanation for the tragedy of her grandfather's story, to find the truth of it so as to clearly redeem his role, she has literally gravitated toward that truth. Yet, far from accomplishing any good for her, this half-conscious obsession to fix her past, leaves her mired in a mental hospital, and in a deep and paralyzing funk.



It is Corwin Peace brings her out of it, literally, when he comes for a visit, plays her and her fellow ward-mates a tune that stuns them, and in Orpheus fashion leads Evelina out the door of the hospital and back to the world of the living. However, while his tune frees Evelina, it brings Warren Wolde's painful memories that induce a fatal heart attack. In a fashion, Corwin's music delivers the little bit of justice that occurs in the novel.



In the various tales that make up this story of Pluto, Erdrich presents music in varied ways. In sum, for Erdrich, music has supernatural power by virtue of it's capacity to connect listeners to memories and emotion. Capable of providing joy and solace, it can also delivers pain and emotional tumult, depending on the reality of the listener's past. In the novel, it intervenes in God-like fashion, as an instrument of justice, saving some, damning others.



In the earliest story chronologically, the music is that of Henri and Lafayette Peace, the Native American guides who ended up saving the land-founding party of which his grandfather was part. The Peace brothers play their violin around the increasingly desperate campfires of the doomed party, mostly offering respite and relaxation. After a particularly dangerous storm, upon waking the next day, they play "a jig of stirring joy...sining a song loud and wailing wild as the blizzard," and "something in the song" delivers a "startling awareness...a sudden, fierce, black happiness."



Henry and Lafayette's violin ends up in Mooshum's brother Shamengwa's hands with none of its powers diminished. Of Shamengwa's music, Coutt's claims:

"The inside became the outside when Shamengwa played...the music was feeling inteslf. The sound connected instantly with something deep and joyous. Those powerful moments of true knowledge that we have to paer over with daily life. The music tapped the back of our terrors, to. Things we'd lived though and didn't want to ever repeat. Shredded imaginings, unadmitted longings, fear and also surprising pleasures."




The violin and it's song come to Shamengwa in a mystical and circuitous fashion. Shamengwa



Corwin comes to possess Shamengwa's music in a similarly roundabout fashion. Originally, Corwin steals Shamengwa's violin without a real clear plan of what he will do with it. As the resident black sheep, everyone on the reservation knows he's stolen it and waits for him to tip his hand in some way.



Like Evelina who unconsciously gravitates to the one true evil that initiates her grandfathers story, Corwin too seems to come to what he's looking for, to his answer, in an unconscious fashion. He steals his salvation, not even realizing it is his salvation. Instead, he sees it as a possible quick source of cash, and eventually he runs off to a mall in Fargo in hopes of selling it to a music lover. However, he's not quite sure how to go about doing this once he gets to the mall. Eventually, he ends up sitting outside a food court at the mall, and after creating a short, attention-getting shriek on the violin, he theatrically pretend plays the instrument. In a book filled with stunning images, a mute Corwin, miming expression in a shopping mall in the hopes of easy money, ranks among the most memorable.



His case is brought before Judge Coutts who considers throwing the book at him but decides on mercy of sorts, sentencing him to music lessons with Shamengwa.



Corwin proves an able learner, and, in the climactic scene, he plays for Evelina and her fellow residents at the mental hospital. Corwin has mastered Shamengwa's sound as described by Coutts above. Corwin's playing brings the room to a standstill, bringing patients out of their rooms and nurses from their station; the room is being visited by a supernatural force. "Their mouths stop moving when he starts playing and some of the patients sit down, right where they are, a couple of them on the floor, as if the music has cut through the big room like a scythe." At first,



The music ticks along in a jerky way, a Red River jig. Then something monstrous happens. All sounds merge for a moment in the belly of the violin and fill the room with distress...Alarm strikes through us...But Corwin draws some note out of the chaos in his hands, and then draws it further up and up, further, until it is unbearable, and at that very point where it might become a shriek, the note changes key a fraction and breaks into the most lucid sweetness.




When I read that passage, I can't help feeling that music is represented and acting as a supernatural force. By it's very being, it's capacity for wrath, chaos and sweetness and peace, the music compels those exposed to it to a judgement of themselves. She claims, "The music understands, and it will be there whether we stay in pain or gain our sanity, which is also painful."



Corwin's song in the hospital induces a fatal heart attack in Warren. It seemingly gives Evelina the power to walk out of the hospital with Corwin shortly after he finishes the number. Thus, it delivers evil to death and brings life to Evelina who is in the midst of a living death. It acts as and is a product of justice. Reflecting on the lynching, Mooshum maintains, "there is no justice here on eart [sic]." Judge Coutts persists in seeking it out, although he is inclined to agree with Burton who said "he who goes to law holds a wolf by the ear." Still, that is his profession. However, his conception of justice envisions it occuring by increments, and, in his capacity as a judge, he delivers justice by indirection via the roads of imagination and mercy.



Saturday, July 5, 2008

Louise Erdrich's Plague of Doves

Doves, birds, and language associated with them, mark Louise Erdrich's new novel, A Plague of Doves. The function and meaning of the birds varies. An overarching meaning to the bird imagery eludes careful reading. Variously, they stand for spirit, fate, hope, truth. Stories and their function are a focus of this novel, and birds are likened to stories; Erdrich describes how a character is "too excited by the story beatings its wings inside of her, alive and insistent that morning for some reason, and she had to talk as we made our way along"(300).

Music also is a central feature, in particular a violin that appears and reappears throughout the book, and which at one point is "placed with great care...in it's velvet nest"(111). Bird's figure often and variously. Inevitably, they seem to stand for all things immaterial and spiritual: Truth, God, beauty, hope. And when these things get too close to earth, when people actually feel they've grasped and own them, they plague.



Similarly, the stories that make up the novel 'plague' or query the tellers, the citizens of present day Pluto, North Dakota and the surrounding reservation.

Despite the best efforts and wishes of those concerned in their truth and in telling them, thse never come to a satisfying closure or strong resolution, and are perpetually becoming new as their tellers pursue them, as others offer parts and retell them. They never settle; all their tellings and retellings aim for a truth, a centrality and finality, but they never gain it. Instead, to borrow an image from earlier in the book, they are like the doves early on who cover the roof of a rural church. "In play it seemed," bird after bird "flew up and knocked a bird off the holy cross that marked the cabin as a church, then took its place, only to be knocked off the crosspiece in turn."



Evelina Harp tells what might seem the pivotal or anchor story: the unjust lynching of four Native Americans for the gruesome murder of a farm family. Evelina doesn't so much tell it, as recount her beloved grandfather's telling of it. She is drawn to it by her beloved Grandfather's prominent role in it. She has a youthful desire to figure out the adult world and it's mysteries. More specifically, she's anxious to find the wrong and right, affix blame and guilt, and label the good and the bad people. Without being quite conscious of it, she is looking for justice. She is "obsessed with lineage," but far from able to draw lines that will clearly distance her and her loved ones from responsibility for evils in the past. In trying to trace out a chart with lines connecting the perpetrators and victims of injustice in the past and herself the folks who surround her in the present, she writes in pencil, finds parts "so complicated that [she]erased parts...until I wore right through the paper," and discovers she "could not erase the questions underneath, and Mooshum was no help."



This tale of racial hatred is knocked off the cross by a tale of racial brotherhood of sorts. It belongs to Judge Antone Coutts. Again, though, like Evelina, he's not telling the tale so much as relaying his Grandfather's account of his first foray into the Dakota's with a land-staking company. In this story, the 'white' men, ancestors of many now living in proximity to each other in Pluto and the surrounding reservation, are saved time and time again by their native American trackers. However, it is never clear that brotherhood comes about between the parties as much as a thoughtless tolerance compelled by necessity. Moreover, whatever brotherhood is brought about comes to the fore only in the face of what would seem a rather capricious and hostile natural world.



It is the central story. The other stories branch out from or (in the case of a settler's story that preceeds it in time) flow into it. However, while the other stories in the book connect to it, and while the ancestors and the descendents of the participants in the lynching figure in the other stories, other connection between the central story and the other stories is open to question. They neither explain the central tale nor can be accounted for by it.



Yet another fact seems to always be added to the story. Most novels are grounded or centered by one story with other, ancillary stories clearly connected to it. Erdrich's book is focused on a central tale, the lynching of four native Americans in North Dakota in 1911.



However, while the novel focuses on this tale and it's reprecussions, she hedges it's centrality. Moreover, it is forever being retold and reread. Her characters continually contest its facts and it's meaning. By granting a respectful space for all these readings, the force shape of tales impact, it's "Truth" becomes confused. Erdrich questions the way novels and stories ground or prioritize stories. For Erdrich, there is not always another version of a story, but there is always a story that comes before the founding story. And, there is always a tributary to that founding tale confusing our reading of it's issue and meaning.

Saturday, June 28, 2008

The Post-birthday World by Lionel Shriver

Character is destiny. Or, so we would like to believe. When we read or watch stories, we expect that the choices and actions of the characters will have a certain inevitability. Reading Madame Bovary, we look to fit the adultery with her circumstances and her character. Given Flaubert's drawing of her, given who she is, in terms of character, time and space, of course she does what she does.


Lionel Shriver's The Post-birthday World is a novel about an adultery and it's alternative that challenges this notion. An expatriate American book illustrator living in London, Irina is involved in an outwardly stable and basically sound relationship with her fellow expatriate Lawrence who works at a think-tank.They are a rather perfect couple. They may not be technically married (Lawrence looks down on such 'formalities'), but they have achieved something. In Irina's estimation, they have accomplished "nine years of mutual devotion." They nurture each other. They are comfortable. They share a happy little home where they share days marked by comforting routines, shared rituals.

Then one night, when Lawrence is out of town, Irina takes a mutual friend, world famous snooker player Ramsey Acton, out on his birthday. She and Ramsey drink a bit too much, they smoke something, and suddenly Irina finds herself alone in Acton's basement snooker lounge and sorely tempted. In a moment, she finds she wants nothing other in the world than to kiss Ramsey. Passionately.

At this point, Shriver divides her story into two strands with alternating chapters. In the one strand, Irena succumbs to temptation. In the other, she remains faithful. Both stories are convincing, almost equally so.

As one might expect, the act/non-act serves as a pivot of sorts. After passionately kissing in the one, Irina and Ramsey set off on a torrid affair. With plenty of regret, guilt and shame, Irena ends up leaving Lawrence and taking up with Ramsey, joining him on the competitive snooker tour. In the other, she sticks with Lawrence, and although she always wonders what she passed up, she's essentially grateful that she was able to resist temptation. Until, one dark day she discovers....

After forking, the two story strands mirror each other: while they differ on the larger plot elements (Irina leaves in the one, stays in the other) and a host of key facts, the two strands share a remarkable amount in terms of details, scenes and settings. Of course, none of these elements ever mirror exactly. Irina's take on a person, event or setting differs markedly depending on whether she's the Irina whose taken up with Ramsey or the Irena whose remained with Lawrence. Thus, the first chapter of the affair story opens with Lawrence returning home the night after the passionate kiss, and with "the rattle of the key in the lock, Irina felt her pulse in her teeth." In the story where Irina resists temptation, the corresponding chapter opens: "To Irina's mind, it was the most underrated of symphonies: the jingle of the ring, the hard rasp, the clip of the bolt widthdrawing, opening sesame." In the strand where she's betrayed him, Irina finds Lawrence's use of her first and middle name, Irina Galina, "a grating singsong, as if she were an adorable Muppet on Sesame Street and not a grown woman." Converserly, for the other, faithful Irina, while she remembers hating the name as a child (as did the Unfaithful Irina), "she now associated it with his voice" and remarks his having converted a hated nickname "first to a joke, and then....to joy."

While different sides of Irina emerge in the differing stories,the two sides that emerge don't openly contradict each other. In both strands, Irina stays essentially the same. While the unfaithful Irina worries about "feeling...unrecognizable to myself," nothing occurs in either story that doesn't make sense. Naturally, the act changes her. But, at some level, Irina seems fully capable of either action. Both seem equally plausible paths and neither action seems out of character. Shriver doesn't call into question her character, her virtue.


Instead, the question which haunts the book is which Irina made the "right" choice? What was gained and lost by staying? What was gained or lost by leaving? Shriver teases out this question through the entire five hundred pages of her book, right up to the end. Far from unequivocally answering it, she instead provocatively confuses the issue.


Nevertheless, it is hard to resist the feeling that the Irena who leaves gains a great deal more than Shriver's faithful version of Irina. {If you intend to read the book, stop reading here, for from here on I will be referring to the end of one strand of Shriver's story}. It is never entirely an open and shut case, but the Irena who leaves finds something in Ramsey she's never encountered. Her affair with him transforms her, brings her to an awareness of sides of herself of which she was unaware. She comes to see him as her "good."

Just after leaving Lawrence, Irina finds herself on a train, headed to a snooker tournament in Bournemouth where she intends to declare her part with Ramsey. Traveling alone on the train, she is plagued by all sorts of doubts and moral qualms. However, when she gets to Bournemouth, Shriver describes how Irina "emerged from the cocoon of her carriage." She has found wings, throws aside doubt, albeit temporarily, and confesses that, "in Ramsey's arms, her attraction to this remarkable snooker player...not only seemed "good," made her "feel good," but seemed an attraction to The Good- to an absolute that made all life worth living, rejection of which would be both morally reprehensible and inhuman."

Ramsey basically fascinates Irena at a very primitive level; her love for him resides largely in her body. Irina enthuses over his having "one of those rare figures that looked completely normal naked- sound, right, whole...[his]burnt-sugar smell was bewitching, and sometimes she would nestle down for a distilled whiff at the base of his neck like sniffing a hot oven ajar." To her mind, "[his body]designed to satisfy Irina McGovern's personal, quixotic aesthetic."

There is a dark side to this. Her fascination partakes of a self-destructive flavor. Irina fears "it was entirely possible she would never want to do anything else but slide in and out of bed with Ramsey...for the rest of her life." Rightfully or wrongly, Irina can't but find this shallow, and her behavior is not in keeping with her notion of who she wants to be. It reveals a part of herself to herself, and she finds the self-revealation "a little bit grim." Still, the Irina who runs after Ramsey has found something.

There are costs to leaving, some bigger than others. She and Lawrence had achieved a domesticity. They had made a home full of comforting places and rituals. The faithful Irina feels she knows Lawrence, albeit almost to boredom. With Lawrence, she has security and she's not a woman to look lightly or derisively on safety.

Her infidelity costs her most dearly in terms of her self-esteem. After proving herself otherwise, Irena discovers that she had unconsciously prided herself on her loyalty and faithfulness to Lawrence. Perhaps without being conscious of it, she took satisfaction in thinking of herself as a decent person. After leaving him, without 'good' cause, she can't think of herself in this way. And, she regrets the irrevocable loss.

Moreover, while she felt "excluded" from Lawrence's world at times, the relationship provided her space, independence, allowing her to find her self. Lawrence took a genuine interest in her career. Perhaps arising from a certain level of analytical detachment, he has a fuller, more mature sense of Irina. She admits "Lawrence could remind her who she was." Ramsey has a single-minded, consuming attachment to his gamee and this seems to preclude his paying attention to much else. He admits, "[Lawrence] helped you with your work and suchlike, where I don't know no children's-book editors from pork pie." In the end, Irina fears that while "[Ramsey] been generous to include her so utterly in his world..[but]inclusion could slyly morph to occlusion."

Yet, Irina seems only capable of fully recognizing and valuing the contentment,the security, the freedom offered by Lawrence only after she's left him. The Irina who stays is unaware of the benefits of her partnership with Lawrence or else needs to make a conscious effort to acknowledge these blessings of being with Lawrence. She does so, but often by invoking an extreme and inverse harm. Faithful Irina is "flummoxed why anyone would exalt unremitting peril. What was dreary about being confident that on the average evening your partner would come home?"

Similarly, the faithful Irina can tell herself that she's been faithful, she's acted decently. However, this provides tepid comfort. It is hard to pat oneself on the back for 'not' doing something. The Irina who leaves labels herself "an unfaithful Hussy." The Irina who stays is grateful "for her own restraint," and, far from feeling virtuous, when she contemplates the infidelity she resisted only feels "a contrasting cleanliness."

Cleanliness is a rather negative virtue. It "refreshes" rather than satisfies. Moreover, 'faithful' Irina remarks, it "would have been more even more refreshing had she intended to tell [Lawrence] everything." Irina never tells Lawrence of her temptation for a reason. The temptation plants a seed, and what rises up in her mind comes to cast a shade over Lawrence and their relationship. Temptation opens her mind to possibilites foregone, and even though resisted, afterward, she seems more keenly aware of the lacks and faults of her relationship with Lawrence. Worse, her fantasies, her doubts, come to feel to her like a partial betrayal, a figurative if not literal infidelity. As Ramsey tells the faithful Irina late in her story, "there's different sorts of betrayal. And...all manner of desertions."

Most cruelly, Shriver deals the worse blow to the faithful Irina at the end of her story. Her fidelity is not met; Lawrence proves unfaithful to her. The reader discovers that in the two strands, Irina and Lawrence serve as rough mirror images of each other. In the one, Irina experiences being unfaithful while Lawrence is betrayed. In the other, these roles are reversed. And, by the very structure of the novel, with it's mirrored story strands, the bitter end to the faithful Irina's story hardly seems tacked on, or simply a misanthropic Shriver's gratuitously piling on the idea of fidelity.

In the end, the infidelity marking both stories is presented as a the logical product of Lawrence and Irina's relationship. Given the terms of their "alliance" (a term Irina uses shortly after Lawrence admits he's been unfaithful), transgression is bound to occur, and it is never a question of whether but of who and when. AT best, their bond is ill-equipped to resist temptation. At worst, Shriver suggests, it almost welcomes it.

Irina and Lawrence's relationship prior to the temptation appears inviting. It is open. It is nurturing. It is free of jealousy. They don't fight much, and very seldom get involved in knock-down-drag-out cage matches. They know each other and are confident in this knowledge. Thus, they both trust the other implicitly.

Of course, these pluses prove to come at a cost and are for the most part the product of Irina and Lawrence's weaknesses and foibles. The two give each other a lot of space, a great deal of privacy, however, most often they do so out of fear. Lawrence adores Irina to the point of piety, or reverence. Shortly after kissing Ramsey, Irina notes that if Lawrence sense anything wrong with her, he is likely to do his best to ignore it: "Lawrence avoided the main thing like the plague." As does the faithful Irina. When Lawrence fails to tell her something indicating a possible infidelity, she avoids bringing it up. While "his omiission grew tumorous...she would brush up against it like a lump on her breast in the shower...[and]as many a woman has done to her peril, she told herself it was nothing."

Both characters oddly ping-pong between feeling they know the other to the point of boredom and not knowing the other at all. Both seem to be involved in a weird dynamic. Both are controlling. In trying to know Lawrence, Irina seeks to 'fix' him with limiting snapshots, or sketches, figuratively speaking. Naturally, given the complexity and unpredictablitiy of anybody,these snapshots periodically fail to map the reality. When they do so, rather than see them as good but imprecise guides, Irina concludes she doesn't know Lawrence at all.

Lawrence and Irina's relationship seems wary, perhaps incapable, of passion. Shriver suggests the lukewarm temperature of their bond is its fatal flaw. As she draws the relationship, it's not a matter of whether someone will stray, but simply when and who will fall prey first thanks to circumstance. And, thus again, infidelity and adultery are not products of character. Or, at best, only indirectly, insofar as Irina and Lawrence's character drives them to an especially adultery prone relationship.

This book is provocative. On almost any page, you will find a pithy and thoughtful aside or comment capable of generating an evenings thought and discussion. It's a meaty book, a densely detailed portrait of a relationship and the personalities that make it up. With it's penchant for aphoristic nuggets, it's concern with large, philosophical questions, and it's incredibly nuanced portraits, it delivers the pleasures of a George Eliot novel. However, while Shriver writes with a similar eloquence, she's a cynic. As much as anything else, chance seems to drive the actions of the characters, and in the end, both Irina's find themselves in remarkably similar circumstances at the end of their stories, despite the very different paths they chose. The two women attain different truths, but neither truth leads to their achieving a superior contentment, an obviously better mind-frame.